For
ages there has been debate in the scientific community around whether the human
animal utilizes pheromones. Even for
those who believe we do, there’s further debate about how powerful the effect
is and what ways the pheromones are used.
For example: Do we communicate to
others our own psychological state and status through olfaction/pheromones? Can we actually change each others’ emotional
states or moods with pheromones? Do we
choose mating partners partially or sometimes completely from pheromonal
cues?
Women of reproductive age who spend
a lot of time together have been documented to tend to menstruate near or at
the same timeframe; many speculate a pheromonal mechanism for this phenomenon. Women who are not on the birth control pill
also prefer the body odor scents of men with major histocompatibility complexes
(MHC) that are different form theirs; could this be a pheromonal mechanism to
encourage healthy diversity in offspring and avoid inbreeding?
At the moment we’ve discovered some
useful facts to fuel speculation. For example,
most or all humans do share the presence of the area in the nose that other
primates use for pheromone detection, the vomeronasal organ (VNO). The human VNO, however, doesn’t appear to
have a designated area of the brain for processing its cues, nor afferent innervation
for VNO pheromonal signals to travel through.
Additionally, many genes that are necessary for animal VNO functioning
are simply absent in humans. It has been
speculated by Wysocki and Preti in 2004 that the olfactory epithelium itself,
rather than the VNO may be able to respond to pheromones and send those cues to
the central nervous system. In other
words, pheromones may exist and function in humans with or without a working
VNO.
The human hypothalamus is
definitely activated by two chemicals that are at least analogous to animal
pheromones: andostradienone and estratetraenol.
Savic,
Hedén-Blomqvist,
Berglund,
in 2009, set out to determine whether this activation happens via the VNO,
veinous blood, or olfactory mucosa by testing the two chemicals on 12 adult men
with nasal polyps. The polyps physically
blocked olfactory cues only, leaving the VNO and vienous blood unaffected. They found that both chemicals failed to activate
the hypothalami of the men with polyps, leading to the conclusion that the
pheromones (or pheromone analogues, depending on your position in the debate) stimulate
the hypothalamus via olfactory epithelium!
See the study abstract here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19235878
Granted this came from the show Manswers, but they reported on a study that was aimed to find the most attractive scent of a man to women. It used artificial pheromones and found that women were more attracted to the natural scent of a man rather than any pheromone on the market at the time
ReplyDeleteGreat study by the University of Chicago confirmed the existence of pheromones.
ReplyDeletePheroGuide.com
This content is written very well. Your use of formatting when making your points makes your observations very clear and easy to understand. Thank you. Pinterest
ReplyDelete